It’s Not About the Platform

A favorite hobby of many in this industry seems to be telling people that they’re doing “it” wrong, whatever “it” is in the given conversation. Now that Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Flickr are out ahead as the major social networks, it becomes harder to debate social platforms, though it definitely still occurs, especially with location-based platforms. One area that has never ceased to die down and has continued to be hotly debated is blogging platforms. A day doesn’t go by that I don’t read a conversation online debating WordPress, Tumblr and Posterous. Other blogging platforms such as SquareSpace, TypePad and MovableType enter the discussion too but the main focus has been between the big 3.

Some people want to debate the technical aspects of the platforms. Some want to debate the ease of use. Others want to debate which has the most active community. Debate is good. It’s healthy for the industry, especially as it continues to mature. However, telling people that they’re wrong for wanting to test new platforms and experiment isn’t healthy. It discourages the creation of content, which is where the focus should be.

I have public and private blogs on all three platforms and manage blogs that are based on other platforms as well. All of them have their pros and their cons. The one you choose is dependent on the type of content that you want to create and your preference for ease of use. There is plenty of fantastic blogs that run on each platform. Because they’re on one platform or another doesn’t make the content on them any different.

I have considered moving this blog off of WordPress and over to Tumblr to allow me to more easily share shorter form content such as quotes or post a quick video that I come across without feeling the need to elaborate at length about it. Whether or not I decide to experiment and transfer this blog will not be done because it is right or wrong, it will be done because of my desire to create content and deciding the type of content that I want to provide to the community at-large.

Whichever platform you choose to create content on, don’t be ashamed of it and don’t let anyone tell you it’s wrong. Do research on the pros, cons and how each compares, decide what you want for yourself and your community and then experiment for a while with each platform. Deal?

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Photo Credit: ladybeames

Using Impressions as a Success Metric

Before getting into my thoughts on whether or not media impressions are a useless success metric, this post was inspired by Rob Clark’s post over on Dave Fleet’s blog on whether or not “share of voice” is a useless PR metric.

One thing that has struck me lately is the reliance on “media impressions” as a measure of success in PR campaigns.

For those that don’t know what media impressions are, they are the number of people who MAY have seen an article, heard something on the radio, saw it on TV or read it on a website or blog. The impressions are simply the media outlet’s circulation, viewership, listenership or readership number. That means that if your PR team reports that a specific article had 8.2 million impressions, that article MAY have been seen by 8.2 million people if 100% of all readers read that article on that day. It doesn’t take into account if someone doesn’t read the article for any variety of reasons. So, when you report that a launch was a success based on the media impressions, you’re basing your measure of success on a number that has a built in unknown error rate.

Additionally, what affect on the bottom line do media impressions have? Sure, we can agree that media impressions equal brand awareness because at least some portion of that readership will read the article about you and the more articles they read about you and the more that your brand is in front of them, the more likelihood your company is to remain top-of-mind in their time of need. Before you take out the daggers, I believe brand awareness is very much needed within companies. But, how are you measuring that brand awareness back into actual dollars?

Let’s translate this into a tangible example: If 2,000 cars drive by my restaurant on a daily basis and therefore I have a pretty sign with our logo and general information on it and not a single one of the people in those 2,000 cars ever comes into the restaurant, where does that leave me? I can’t go to the bank and tell them that I get approximately 2,000 impressions per day. That’s not going to pay back the loan. That’s not going to pay the servers. What pays this overhead are people sitting down and ordering a meal.

This debate is similar to the number of followers one has on Twitter. How many people actually read your tweets? Of that number how many actually take action from one of your tweets? How about on your Facebook Page. Facebook now reports the number of impressions per update on a Page. Does that mean anything? What does 8,589 impressions on a Facebook status update *really* mean? How does that track back to your sales pipeline?

You can see the trend here. We report success based on impressions, whether they’re media impressions, Twitter followers, RSS subscribers or Facebook likes. We rely on a number of people that MAY have seen our content as opposed to the actual number of people that did read it, the number of people who took action and the number of people that bought.

When I’ve brought this question up to colleagues and friends, they all agree that these may not be the best metrics but it’s better than nothing so we standardize our reporting to determine success on the number of impressions that we may receive. I do think it’s an important metric but it can’t be the end-all, be-all, let’s go grab beers and celebrate our success-type of metric. It should be ONE part of your reporting, not your whole report.

What are your thoughts? Maybe more seasoned PR professional will have a different view and I’d love to hear your thoughts on the topic. Are media impressions a useless metric?

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Photo Credit: m.eckelberg

11 Steps to Developing a Digital Crisis Communications Plan

What separates an elite military group such as the Navy Seals from others? They train non-stop. They train for every situation imaginable. They train for what happens when the plans fail. When they execute a mission they’re relying not just on their skills, they’re relying on their training. In business we need to think more like Navy Seals and train for situations that could endanger our community, our customers, our partners and our vendors.

Our ability to prepare and train for such situations is what will help us when everything hits the fan, the boss is calling, emails are flying in and you’re sitting there trying to figure out what to do. Darren Rowse tweeted out a quote from Bear Bryant that said: “It’s not the will to win, but the will to prepare to win that makes the difference.” It’s in the preparation that separates the good from the great.

With the 24/7 news cycle and the fire hose of information that is always coming at us, it is surprising the number of people that I speak with who don’t have a digital crisis communications plan. Over the past couple years as social media has continued it’s explosive growth, we have seen so many examples of companies who have experienced a crisis due to an accidental tweet, a campaign gone wrong, a misstatement by a spokesperson or the collapse of an industry. But for every major crisis that we hear about there are thousands of crises which will never bubble up to the surface that are the little situations that we deal with on a daily basis. If we’re able to mitigate or solve the issue then it doesn’t grow into a case-study level crisis.

These plans don’t have to be overly complex or difficult to understand. In fact, they need to be written in easy-to-understand language so that when it comes time to take the plan of the shelf and execute against it, everyone isn’t left scratching their heads at a weird acronym or section of legalese. Ever since last year when I read the Radian6 “Social Media Monitoring and Engagement Playbook” and since joining Citrix Online, I have been thinking about digital crisis communications and the basic steps to developing a plan.

Using bits from the Radian6 playbook and my own experiences, I have boiled it down into 11 steps to developing a digital crisis communications plan. Some of these steps may not apply for your company depending on the size of company, whether you have an international customer base and several other factors.

 

11 Steps to Developing a Digital Crisis Communications Plan

1. Choose and set up your monitoring platform(s)

Choose the platform that is right for your company. There are plenty of them out there and even if you’re not ready to move to a premium solution yet, you can still grow bigger ears for free.

2. Determine your monitoring schedule

After you have selected and set up your monitoring platform you need decide what your monitoring schedule will be. Who will be involved? What times will they be monitoring? Will it be active or passive monitoring? Do you need international support? All of these questions will need to be answered to determine what your monitoring schedule needs to be.

3. Ensure local language support teams

If you have an international customer, partner or vendor base then you need to ensure you have the capabilities to respond in local language to any crisis that may occur. In the U.S. we tend to be an ethnocentric society who believes that our way is the right way. That how and when we communicate is the same everywhere. However, that is far from the case. You need folks on your team that understand, can monitor and respond in local language.

4. Determine what constitutes a crisis

What constitutes a crisis for your company? Not everything will be a “run around the office with your hair on fire” type of crisis (well, hopefully not!) but you need to have an ability to rate or grade the situation to determine whether something is escalating to crisis-level. You may choose a numerical score or a letter grade. You can use a severity grid such as “xx number of comments in 24 hours” or make it situation-specific. Whatever it is, make sure you understand what a crisis is for YOUR company.

5. Determine what you WILL respond to

It is important to have listed what your company is willing to respond to. These may be general inquiries such as customer service/support issues, product inquiries or publicly available information.

6. Determine what you WILL NOT respond to

Equally, if not more important is having listed what your company WILL NOT respond to. These may be legal or financial inquiries that are not publicly available, potentially inflammatory comments or something that the company does not possess the ability to properly respond to.

7. Form your digital crisis communications team

You need to form a digital crisis communications team that is comprised of stakeholders from across the business. Depending on the severity of a crisis and who it involves, it will mean that different stakeholders will need to be activated. Therefore they need to be aware of and bought in to the plan because not only will you turn to them during the crisis for support, they’re the experts of their respective areas. For example, Legal may want to be involved in anything that involves an employee issue. HR may not want to be involved in customer support issues, even if escalated to a crisis-level. Another team may prefer to be notified after it has been resolved, just as a FYI. It is important to understand these dynamics and the level of involvement needed and wanted. Some members of your core digital crisis communications team should include:

  • Internal Communications
  • Marketing
  • PR
  • HR
  • International Teams
  • Customer Service
  • Agency Support

You may also have an extended team that could include: Creative, Web Development, Customer Insights, SEO, Sales and any other relevant teams, depending on the size of your company.

Be sure to include contact information for every member and proxy/backups for each person.

8. Escalation ladder and flow

Who needs to be notified and when. It’s as simple as that. Have a simple grid that lists who is notified, when, how fast and the method of communication. For example, an email will be sent to the VP of Corporate Communications. If no response is received within 30 minutes, it will be escalated to the SVP of Marketing.

9. Who will respond on the company’s behalf

It’s important to determine who will respond on the company’s behalf. Who will be the online spokesperson for your company. Remember that it may not be the same person every time. You probably don’t want your CEO responding to every inquiry during a crisis. But, you may want to call them in for a high profile response, an influential website or an interview. List who is authorized to respond and under what circumstances.

10. What to report on and how frequently

During and following a crisis the executives and managers will want to understand what happened, how it was handled and what affect it had on the company. Determine what that frequency is that they want and what they’re interested in having reported. During the crisis you may report every hour then move to once per day, once per week and then a final report. Agree to this so there is no confusion on when and what will be reported.

11. Build support beams

You can’t do this alone and you shouldn’t attempt to. Make partnerships, build a team and develop internal support for your plan. It will be important during a crisis and you will be thankful for developing these partnerships ahead of time.

Below is a slide deck that I put together that’s part of a speech I give on digital crisis communications. If you can view it below, you can find it over on Slideshare.

 
 
Does your company have a digital crisis communications plan? Has your company had to execute against this plan yet? What were your experiences?

 

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Photo Credit: Will Scullin